Live

Infographics on managerial research papers, distilling what matters most for practitioners.

AI & The Job Market

What the data says about young workers


−14%

Drop in hiring rate for 22–25 year-olds

into AI-exposed occupations since ChatGPT’s release


1

No unemployment increase

AI is not raising unemployment in exposed occupations. Not yet.

2

But hiring is slowing

Among 22–25 year-olds, entry into AI-exposed jobs dropped ∼14%.

3

Not firing. Not hiring.

AI isn’t displacing current workers. It may be closing the door for new ones.

4

Business school jobs at risk

Financial analysis, marketing research, sales, customer service — all top 10 exposed.

5

Business schools must act

Not just teach AI tools, but build skills that AI cannot replace.

6

Our students are next

The 22–25 year-olds in that data were our students. Today’s classrooms are next.


Source: Massenkoff & McCrory (2026), Labor market impacts of AI. Anthropic.

This Anthropic report introduces “observed exposure,” a measure of actual AI adoption derived from millions of real Claude conversations mapped to occupational tasks. The headline finding: AI is not yet causing detectable layoffs, but it is quietly reducing entry-level hiring in exposed occupations. For business schools, this is a call to rethink curricula around the skills AI cannot replicate.

AI & Critical Thinking

What happens when knowledge workers trust the machine


4 in 10

AI-assisted work tasks where knowledge workers

report not engaging in critical thinking


1

More AI trust, less thinking

Workers confident in AI’s ability are significantly less likely to question its output.

2

Evaluation hit hardest

Judging quality and validity — the highest-order skill — shows the steepest decline in effort.

3

Self-confidence protects

Workers who trust their own skills keep thinking critically, even when using AI.

4

From doing to overseeing

AI shifts the work from producing to verifying, integrating, and managing output.


Source: Lee, Sarkar, Tankelevitch et al. (2025), The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking. CHI ’25, ACM.

A Microsoft Research study of 319 knowledge workers and 936 real AI-assisted tasks. AI does not just change what we do — it changes how we think. Teaching AI tools is not enough; educators must actively build the critical thinking that AI risks atrophying.